Async/await
There’s a special syntax to work with promises in a more comfortable fashion, called “async/await”. It’s surprisingly easy to understand and use.
Let’s start with the async
keyword. It can be placed before a function, like this:
The word “async” before a function means one simple thing: a function always returns a promise. Other values are wrapped in a resolved promise automatically.
For instance, this function returns a resolved promise with the result of 1
; let’s test it:
…We could explicitly return a promise, which would be the same:
So, async
ensures that the function returns a promise, and wraps non-promises in it. Simple enough, right? But not only that. There’s another keyword, await
, that works only inside async
functions, and it’s pretty cool.
The syntax:
The keyword await
makes JavaScript wait until that promise settles and returns its result.
Here’s an example with a promise that resolves in 1 second:
The function execution “pauses” at the line (*)
and resumes when the promise settles, with result
becoming its result. So the code above shows “done!” in one second.
Let’s emphasize: await
literally suspends the function execution until the promise settles, and then resumes it with the promise result. That doesn’t cost any CPU resources, because the JavaScript engine can do other jobs in the meantime: execute other scripts, handle events, etc.
It’s just a more elegant syntax of getting the promise result than promise.then
. And, it’s easier to read and write.
Can’t use await
in regular functions
If we try to use await
in a non-async function, there would be a syntax error:
We may get this error if we forget to put async
before a function. As stated earlier, await
only works inside an async
function.
Let’s take the showAvatar()
example from the chapter Promises chaining and rewrite it using async/await
:
We’ll need to replace
.then
calls withawait
.Also we should make the function
async
for them to work.
Pretty clean and easy to read, right? Much better than before.
Modern browsers allow top-level await
in modules
In modern browsers, await
on top level works just fine, when we’re inside a module. We’ll cover modules in article Modules, introduction.
For instance:
If we’re not using modules, or older browsers must be supported, there’s a universal recipe: wrapping into an anonymous async function.
Like this:
await
accepts “thenables”
Like promise.then
, await
allows us to use thenable objects (those with a callable then
method). The idea is that a third-party object may not be a promise, but promise-compatible: if it supports .then
, that’s enough to use it with await
.
Here’s a demo Thenable
class; the await
below accepts its instances:
If await
gets a non-promise object with .then
, it calls that method providing the built-in functions resolve
and reject
as arguments (just as it does for a regular Promise
executor). Then await
waits until one of them is called (in the example above it happens in the line (*)
) and then proceeds with the result.
Async class methods
To declare an async class method, just prepend it with async
:
The meaning is the same: it ensures that the returned value is a promise and enables await
.
If a promise resolves normally, then await promise
returns the result. But in the case of a rejection, it throws the error, just as if there were a throw
statement at that line.
This code:
…is the same as this:
In real situations, the promise may take some time before it rejects. In that case there will be a delay before await
throws an error.
We can catch that error using try..catch
, the same way as a regular throw
:
In the case of an error, the control jumps to the catch
block. We can also wrap multiple lines:
If we don’t have try..catch
, then the promise generated by the call of the async function f()
becomes rejected. We can append .catch
to handle it:
If we forget to add .catch
there, then we get an unhandled promise error (viewable in the console). We can catch such errors using a global unhandledrejection
event handler as described in the chapter Error handling with promises.
async/await
and promise.then/catch
When we use async/await
, we rarely need .then
, because await
handles the waiting for us. And we can use a regular try..catch
instead of .catch
. That’s usually (but not always) more convenient.
But at the top level of the code, when we’re outside any async
function, we’re syntactically unable to use await
, so it’s a normal practice to add .then/catch
to handle the final result or falling-through error, like in the line (*)
of the example above.
async/await
works well with Promise.all
When we need to wait for multiple promises, we can wrap them in Promise.all
and then await
:
In the case of an error, it propagates as usual, from the failed promise to Promise.all
, and then becomes an exception that we can catch using try..catch
around the call.
The async
keyword before a function has two effects:
Makes it always return a promise.
Allows
await
to be used in it.
The await
keyword before a promise makes JavaScript wait until that promise settles, and then:
If it’s an error, an exception is generated — same as if
throw error
were called at that very place.Otherwise, it returns the result.
Together they provide a great framework to write asynchronous code that is easy to both read and write.
With async/await
we rarely need to write promise.then/catch
, but we still shouldn’t forget that they are based on promises, because sometimes (e.g. in the outermost scope) we have to use these methods. Also Promise.all
is nice when we are waiting for many tasks simultaneously.
Last updated